Our editorial approach
Context before conclusions
Kisanga uses a practical sourcing approach: published literature, public registries, official materials, and primary sources are preferred where they can clarify a question. Sources are considered for relevance, currency, limits, and whether a claim can be traced back to the record that supports it.
When research is discussed, the aim is to distinguish a finding from a conclusion that goes beyond it. ClinicalTrials.gov’s public study record is one example of a registry readers can use to see how a study is described, including its stated purpose and status.
Kisanga also treats source quality as part of the message. Definitions, methods, and uncertainty should be visible rather than buried. The National Library of Medicine’s overview of evidence-based practice describes the importance of integrating evidence with expertise and individual circumstances; an information resource can explain that framework, but cannot replace the people responsible for care.